21:30 #spi: < bdale> *GAVEL* 21:30 #spi: < bdale> [item 1, Opening] Welcome to today's Software in the Public Interest board of directors meeting, which is now called to order. 21:30 #spi: < bdale> Today's agenda and details of pending resolutions can be found on the web at: http://www.spi-inc.org/meetings/agendas/2011/2011-08-10/ 21:30 #spi: < bdale> [item 2, Roll Call] 21:30 #spi: < bdale> Board members, please state your name for the record. As we have nine board members, quorum for today's meeting is six. 21:30 #spi: < bdale> Guests (including board advisors), please /msg your names to Noodles if you wish your attendance to be recorded in the minutes of this meeting. 21:30 #spi: < Noodles> Jonathan McDowell 21:30 #spi: < Hydroxide> Jimmy Kaplowitz 21:30 #spi: < schultmc> Michael Schultheiss 21:30 #spi: < zobel> Martin Zobel-Helas 21:30 #spi: < bdale> Bdale Garbee 21:30 #spi: < Solver> Robert Brockway 21:30 #spi: < Hydroxide> that's quorum. 21:31 #spi: < Ganneff> Joerg Jaspert 21:31 #spi: < Noodles> I've had regrets from Clint. 21:31 #spi: < bdale> who's missing? 21:31 #spi: < Noodles> Joshua. 21:31 #spi: < bdale> ok .. hopefully he'll join us, but I think we can proceed 21:31 #spi: < bdale> [item 3, President's Report] 21:31 #spi: < bdale> In late July, we held a well-attended SPI BOF during Debconf11 in Banja Luka. For anyone interested, a video recording of the meeting is available online at 21:31 #spi: < bdale> http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2011/debconf11/low/703_SPI_BOF.ogv 21:31 #spi: < bdale> I'd also like to congratulate and welcome our new board members Clint Adams and Robert Brockway, and welcome Jimmy back to the board for another term. 21:31 #spi: < bdale> And profound thanks to David Graham who chose to retire from the board this year after many years of service! 21:32 #spi: < Hydroxide> thanks and congrats as well 21:32 #spi: < zobel> during that bof a few items came up, we should work on 21:32 #spi: < bdale> yes 21:32 #spi: < bdale> good things to do in email 21:33 #spi: < bdale> [item 4, Treasurer's Report] 21:33 #spi: < bdale> Michael? 21:33 #spi: < schultmc> Standard report is in the agenda 21:33 #spi: < schultmc> nothing much of note 21:33 #spi: < Hydroxide> schultmc: one question about that 21:34 #spi: < Hydroxide> schultmc: we're getting close to the $250k assets level. this is great, but it does mean we may need a formal CPA audit soon under NY (and IRS?) rules. have you started planning for this? 21:34 #spi: < schultmc> Hydroxide: yes - although we're exempt from that requirement currently 21:34 #spi: < Hydroxide> schultmc: will we still be exempt when we cross that threshold? 21:34 #spi: < Hydroxide> and, glad to hear it's on your radar 21:35 #spi: < schultmc> Hydroxide: yes - it has to do with how much we collect from NY sources 21:35 #spi: < Hydroxide> ok. 21:35 #spi: < bdale> schultmc: glad you're on top of it, let us know if there are any board actions required around this 21:35 #spi: * Hydroxide still has questions about e.g. IRS rules but we don't need to take up meeting time with that. I appeciate your work on these requirements 21:35 #spi: < schultmc> bdale: will do 21:36 #spi: < bdale> [item 5, Secretary's report] 21:36 #spi: < bdale> Jonathan? 21:37 #spi: < Noodles> Nothing in particular from me. There was a comment here in the past few weeks about Tux4Kids not being on the project page; I've had a trawl through the resolutions, confirmed they had one and added them. I didn't see any other missing projects. 21:37 #spi: < Noodles> (Though I failed to find the resolutions for some of the existing ones, which I need to go and have a better look for.) 21:37 #spi: < Solver> Thanks for following up on that noodles 21:37 #spi: < bdale> oh, thanks for taking care of that .. some projects may pre-date our current resolution process, but they'd be easy to guess at 21:38 #spi: < Noodles> freedesktop.org, Fresco, OFTC, OpenVAS, Open Voting Foundation + PostgreSQL FWIW. 21:38 #spi: < bdale> related to this, I'd like to know that we have a current list of contacts for our associated projects, and know where to find that list routinely 21:38 #spi: < Noodles> I think the project pages themselves would be best, but we'd need to check with projects that they're ok with having contact email addresses listed publicly. 21:39 #spi: < schultmc> we should also make sure liaisons are subscribed to spi-projects 21:39 #spi: < bdale> please take that as an action item, then, and feel free to cc me on any discussions that result 21:39 #spi: < bdale> schultmc: good point 21:39 #spi: < bdale> ok, anything else? 21:39 #spi: < Noodles> Nope. 21:40 #spi: < bdale> [item 6, Outstanding minutes] 21:40 #spi: < bdale> Jonathan, I believe we have last month's to vote on? 21:40 #spi: < Noodles> Yup, nothing else outstanding. 21:40 #spi: < Noodles> Voting started, 7 people (bdale,zobel,hydroxide,schultmc,solver,ganneff,noodles) allowed to vote on Minutes for July 13th 2011 AGM. - You may vote yes/no/abstain only, type !vote $yourchoice now. 21:40 #spi: < Ganneff> !vote yes 21:40 #spi: < Noodles> !vote yes 21:40 #spi: < Hydroxide> !vote yes 21:40 #spi: < bdale> !vote yes 21:40 #spi: < Solver> !abstain 21:40 #spi: < Solver> !vote abstain 21:40 #spi: < zobel> !vote yes 21:41 #spi: < schultmc> !vote yes 21:41 #spi: < Noodles> Current voting results for "Minutes for July 13th 2011 AGM": Yes: 6, No: 0, Abstain: 1, Missing: 0 () 21:41 #spi: < Noodles> Voting for "Minutes for July 13th 2011 AGM" closed. 21:41 #spi: < bdale> thank you 21:41 #spi: < bdale> [item 7, Items up for discussion] 21:41 #spi: < bdale> [item 7.1, SPI Resolution 2011-08-10.bg.1 (Drizzle as associated project)] 21:41 #spi: < bdale> Are there any questions about this resolution, or are we ready to voite? 21:41 #spi: < bdale> vote, even 21:41 #spi: < Solver> I'm happy to proceed 21:42 #spi: < Noodles> Voting started, 7 people (bdale,zobel,hydroxide,schultmc,solver,ganneff,noodles) allowed to vote on Resolution 2011-08-10.bg.1 - Drizzle as associated project. - You may vote yes/no/abstain only, type !vote $yourchoice now. 21:42 #spi: < Hydroxide> !vote yes 21:42 #spi: < schultmc> !vote yes 21:42 #spi: < Ganneff> !vote yes 21:42 #spi: < bdale> !vote yes 21:42 #spi: < Solver> !vote yes 21:42 #spi: < Noodles> !vote yes 21:42 #spi: < zobel> !vote yes 21:42 #spi: < Noodles> Current voting results for "Resolution 2011-08-10.bg.1 - Drizzle as associated project": Yes: 7, No: 0, Abstain: 0, Missing: 0 () 21:42 #spi: < Noodles> Voting for "Resolution 2011-08-10.bg.1 - Drizzle as associated project" closed. 21:42 #spi: < bdale> thank you 21:42 #spi: < bdale> [item 7.2, SPI Resolution 2011-08-10.bg.1 (Arch Linux as associated project)] 21:43 #spi: < bdale> Are there any questions about this resolution, or are we ready to vote? 21:43 #spi: < bdale> sorry, that should be .2 21:43 #spi: < Ganneff> vote 21:43 #spi: < Noodles> Voting started, 7 people (bdale,zobel,hydroxide,schultmc,solver,ganneff,noodles) allowed to vote on Resolution 2011-08-10.bg.2 - Arch Linux as associated project. - You may vote yes/no/abstain only, type !vote $yourchoice now. 21:43 #spi: < zobel> !vote yes 21:43 #spi: < Ganneff> !vote yes 21:43 #spi: < schultmc> !vote yes 21:43 #spi: < Noodles> !vote yes 21:43 #spi: < Solver> !vote yes 21:43 #spi: < Hydroxide> !vote yes 21:44 #spi: < Noodles> bdale? 21:44 #spi: < bdale> phone 21:44 #spi: < bdale> !vote yes 21:44 #spi: < bdale> sorry 21:44 #spi: < Noodles> Current voting results for "Resolution 2011-08-10.bg.2 - Arch Linux as associated project": Yes: 7, No: 0, Abstain: 0, Missing: 0 () 21:44 #spi: < Noodles> Voting for "Resolution 2011-08-10.bg.2 - Arch Linux as associated project" closed. 21:44 #spi: < zobel> congratulations to both projects. 21:44 #spi: < bdale> [item 8, Appointment of board officers] 21:44 #spi: < bdale> Jonathan, do you want to take the lead on this, starting with the results of your email poll regarding who among us are willing to continue their current roles? 21:44 #spi: < hingo> Thank you :-) 21:45 #spi: < Noodles> I've had self nominations from bdale, schultmc and myself to continue in our existing positions (President, Treasurer + Secretary respectively). 21:45 #spi: < Noodles> I haven't seen anything about Vice President, nor from any one else for those positions. 21:45 #spi: * Ganneff goes for vp again 21:45 #spi: < bdale> ok 21:46 #spi: < Noodles> Does anyone else wish to put themselves forward? 21:46 #spi: < bdale> so we have the slate of existing officers willing to continue. does anyone else want to nominate themselves for any of the roles? 21:46 #spi: * Hydroxide is fine remaining as a non-officer director for the next year 21:46 #spi: * zobel plans to not stand for any role ATM 21:46 #spi: < Solver> No plans here either, thanks 21:47 #spi: < bdale> ok, so do we need to vote, and if so can we do it as one approval of the slate vote? 21:47 #spi: < Hydroxide> given that Clint and linuxpoet aren't present, that's all the board members 21:47 #spi: < Noodles> Voting started, 7 people (bdale,zobel,hydroxide,schultmc,solver,ganneff,noodles) allowed to vote on Reappoint Bdale, Michael, Jonathan and Joerg in their board officer positions. - You may vote yes/no/abstain only, type !vote $yourchoice now. 21:47 #spi: < bdale> !vote yes 21:47 #spi: < Hydroxide> !vote yes 21:47 #spi: < schultmc> !vote yes 21:47 #spi: < Solver> !vote yes 21:47 #spi: < Noodles> I think we do need to vote (we did in previous years), but I think it can be done as one. 21:47 #spi: < zobel> !vote yes 21:47 #spi: < Ganneff> !vote yes 21:47 #spi: < Noodles> !vote yes 21:47 #spi: * Hydroxide nods at Noodles 21:47 #spi: < Noodles> Current voting results for "Reappoint Bdale, Michael, Jonathan and Joerg in their board officer positions": Yes: 7, No: 0, Abstain: 0, Missing: 0 () 21:47 #spi: < Noodles> Voting for "Reappoint Bdale, Michael, Jonathan and Joerg in their board officer positions" closed. 21:47 #spi: < bdale> wfm 21:48 #spi: < Hydroxide> thanks and congrats/condolences to the officers :) 21:48 #spi: < bdale> thanks to the board for the vote of confidence, and your continued support 21:48 #spi: < bdale> [item 9, Any other business] 21:48 #spi: < bdale> Do any board members have other items for discussion they would like to address briefly? 21:48 #spi: < Ganneff> ay 21:48 #spi: * Hydroxide has two too 21:48 #spi: < Hydroxide> Ganneff first 21:48 #spi: * Noodles too. 21:48 #spi: < bdale> Noodles: perhaps you can invite our new associated projects here if the reps are present? 21:48 #spi: * zobel nothing. 21:48 #spi: < bdale> Ganneff: go 21:49 #spi: < Ganneff> the board subscription change clint mentioned on board@ - is that ok to change to that other guy or do we even have a "role" address so its not person bound for them? thats the softwarefreedom.org board@ subscriber 21:49 #spi: < bdale> I think for legal reps, having specific individuals makes sense 21:50 #spi: < bdale> if the SFLC wants to change who the designated rep is, I don't think having to update our list from time to time is a big burden 21:50 #spi: < Ganneff> its not. 21:50 #spi: < Ganneff> so aaronw its going to be then 21:50 #spi: < Ganneff> next 21:51 #spi: < bdale> and I believe Clint can be assumed to be speaking authoritatively, since he's an SFLC employee 21:51 #spi: < Ganneff> ok 21:51 #spi: < Hydroxide> I emailed the contact Clint mentioned as well as the existing contact at SFLC who I was working on a trademark issue with to confirm who our first point of contact there should be, for new issues - haven't heard back, but I agree with bdale about assumptions 21:51 #spi: < bdale> Hydroxide: ok .. you had an item regarding trademarks? 21:52 #spi: < Hydroxide> yeah. I just heard back from Mishi Choudhary at SFLC today - apparently WIPO has given us a certificate of registration for the Debian trademark under the Madrid Protocol, for the EU, (People's Republic of) China, Japan, and (for some reason listed separately) the UK 21:52 #spi: < bdale> cool! 21:52 #spi: < Ganneff> aaronw subscribed 21:52 #spi: < Hydroxide> I think there may be further processing needed on the various countries' trademark offices, but that's good news. for some reason she didn't CC board@ 21:53 #spi: < Solver> Well done to all involved 21:53 #spi: < bdale> is there any action we need to take? 21:53 #spi: < Hydroxide> bdale: the only action may be following up with specific countries where pre-existing trademarks (usually owned by friendly people/orgs) already exist, to sort out the duplicates, and remembering to follow up in 2021 for renewals :) 21:53 #spi: < Hydroxide> no board vote needed, though 21:54 #spi: < bdale> ok, sounds good 21:54 #spi: < bdale> Hydroxide: you had another item? 21:54 #spi: < zobel> Hydroxide: thx for working on this! 21:54 #spi: < Hydroxide> the other issue I had was the same suggestion of extending our new associated projects in person to those who have reps present 21:54 #spi: < Hydroxide> zobel, Solver: np 21:54 #spi: < bdale> ok .. Noodles, feel free to do that, and/or you had another item? 21:54 #spi: < Hydroxide> *our new associated project invitiations 21:55 #spi: < bdale> I see that hingo is here 21:55 #spi: < Noodles> hingo is here from Drizzle, do we have anyone from Arch present? 21:55 #spi: * Hydroxide notes for the meeting log that according to /whois, hingo is Henrik Ingo 21:55 #spi: < hingo> Yes. That's correct :-) 21:56 #spi: < bdale> hingo: as SPI liaison for Drizzle, do you want to accept our invitation? 21:56 #spi: < hingo> Yes, on behalf of Drizzle project, I'd like to accept the associated project status. 21:56 #spi: < bdale> great! congrats, and welcome. 21:56 #spi: < Hydroxide> \o/ 21:57 #spi: < Noodles> hingo: Send me a logo and some blurb for your project page? 21:57 #spi: < hingo> If the board is interested, I'm also prepared to share a few sentences on our next steps in this process? 21:57 #spi: < bdale> hingo: that would be fine 21:57 #spi: < Solver> I'm interested 21:57 #spi: < hingo> A driving reason to become an associated project has been the desire to anchor drizzle.org domain name and the Drizzle name (which probably counts as a trademark) in a good non-profit organization. They're currently held by 2-3 different individuals. After this meeting I will want to approach the board to learn how we can do that. 21:57 #spi: < hingo> While we are completing those steps, we will probably not make any big announcements of our new SPI status, rather we'll do that when the whole process is completed. 21:57 #spi: < bdale> ok 21:57 #spi: < Ganneff> hingo: you will want to mail hostmaster@spi-inc.org about the domain 21:58 #spi: < bdale> it will show up in our meeting minutes, of course, but that's not a big announcement 21:58 #spi: < Hydroxide> hingo: and board@spi-inc.org about the trademarks 21:58 #spi: < hingo> It's not confidential, just that we'll have the big parties later. 21:58 #spi: < bdale> ;-) 21:58 #spi: < Hydroxide> hingo: ok. so are you okay with it being listed as an associated project on SPI's website before those are taken care of? (without big publicity) 21:59 #spi: < hingo> Hydroxide: Yes, and that's of course correct to do so. I'll make sure to send the logo. 21:59 #spi: < Hydroxide> k 21:59 #spi: < bdale> Noodles: you'll email Aaron Griffin about the Arch invite, or should I? 21:59 #spi: < Noodles> I'll do so. 21:59 #spi: < bdale> thank you 22:00 #spi: < bdale> ok, any other items to discuss? 22:00 #spi: < bdale> [item 10, Next board meeting] 22:00 #spi: < bdale> Our next regularly-scheduled monthly meeting will be 13 September 2011, 20:30 UTC. 22:00 #spi: < bdale> Any strong objections? 22:00 #spi: < Noodles> Do we want to move the meeting time slightly later for Solver? 22:00 #spi: < schultmc> September 13 is Tuesday iirc 22:00 #spi: < Solver> this time is good actually 22:00 #spi: < Solver> thanks 22:00 #spi: < zobel> Noodles: please not. its 22:30 starting time. 22:00 #spi: < Noodles> Sorry, yes, it should be the 14th. 22:00 #spi: < zobel> for CEST 22:00 #spi: < bdale> oh, oops 22:01 #spi: < Noodles> zobel: Fair enough. 22:01 #spi: < bdale> Noodles: so we're agreed 14th September 2011 at 20:30 UTC? 22:01 #spi: < Noodles> Sounds like it. 22:01 #spi: < bdale> wfm 22:01 #spi: < bdale> Ok, thank you to everyone present for participating today. 22:01 #spi: < bdale> *GAVEL*